Legal Opinion

Stover v. Inhabitants of Bluehill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On Exceptions, to the rulings of Dickerson, J. Case to recover damages for an injury to the female plaintiff, received in consequence of a defective highway.

Read the full summary

On Exceptions, to the rulings of Dickerson, J. Case to recover damages for an injury to the female plaintiff, received in consequence of a defective highway. The defendants excepted to the admission of the plaintiffs as witnesses, and to an instruction to the jury, which is stated in the opinion. cited Moore v. Abbott, 32 Maine, 46; Shepherd v. Chelsea, 4 Allen, 113; Kidder v. Dun-stable, 7 Gray, 104; Rowell v. Lowell, 7 Gray, 100; Miller v. Mariners’ Church, 7 Maine, 51-55; 2. Parsons on Con., 454; Keith v. Pinkham, 43 Maine, 501; Tuttle v. Holyoke, 6 Gray, 447; Kastman v. Sanborn, 3 Allen,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Dickerson, J.

This case comes before this Court on exceptions and motion.

The defendant’s objection to the competency of the plaintiffs, as witnesses, is not insisted upon in the argument. They were, however, properly allowed to testify. Palmer v. Bangor, 46 Maine, 325.

The exceptions relied upon were taken to the instructions of the presiding Judge to the jury upon the subject of damages, as follows : — that it was the duty of the plaintiffs to employ a surgeon of ordinary professional knowledge and skill, and to follow his necessary directions, and that,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Selleck v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Edmondson v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Boehmer v. BoggianoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Steeves v. IrwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Williams v. DaleOregon Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API