Legal Opinion
Druxinman v. Smith
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1920No. 15916PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from' a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Sheeks, J., entered December 29, 1919, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On November 12, 1917, the respondents, Smith et al., being then the owners of certain real property situated in the city of Aberdeen, leased the same to the appellant. Druxinman for a term of three years. The lease was in writing and contained, among others, the following condition:
“It is further covenanted and agreed that this lease is made subject to the right of the lessors to sell and dispose of the said premises, and that in case of such a bona fide sale, this lease shall be and become at the option of the lessors null1 and void upon sixty days’ written notice given by the lessors to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Younkman v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Upton v. TothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Luse v. ElliottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Fox v. ADRIAN REALTY COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Pierce v. Mountain Lion Consolidated Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935