Luse v. Elliott

The controlling facts are not in dispute. The appellee R. K. Luse, prior to the transactions here involved, was the owner of a farm of 240 acres. The appellant was a tenant on the farm, under a written lease, for a term of four years from March 1, 1924. The lease provided:

“In event the lessor should sell said farm on or before the 1st day of Sept, of any year, during the existence of this lease and notify the lessee in writing that the said farm had been sold then this lease may be terminated on the 1st day of March next succeeding the giving of said notice of sale. ’ ’

On August 29, 1925,…