Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Taylor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original application by the State, on the relation of Andrew Miller,. Attorney General, for an injunction permanently restraining E. J. Taylor and others, as the State Board of Normal School Trustees, from establishing a state normal school in the City, of Minot, and Gunder Olson, as Treasurer, from paying out the money of the State therefor.

1Opinion of the Court

Spalding, Ch. J.

This 'is an application for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, who are the State Board of Normal School Trustees, and the state treasurer, from locating a proposed normal school at the city of Minot, in Ward county, and expending any money belonging to the state of North Dakota for such purpose or for the erection of buildings therefor. The questions involved are of great temporary interest and importance; but, as the main question is unlikely ever to arise a second time, we shall content ourselves with stating the reasons for our conclusions as briefly as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Livermore v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rausch v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State ex rel. Gaulke v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kelly v. LaingMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Murray v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API