Silavent v. Silavent
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
This appeal is from a decree modifying a divorce decree awarding custody of the parties’ minor children.
The principal question presented' concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to' support the decree of modification. Appellee takes the position, in which we concur, that this question cannot be considered' since it affirmatively appears from the record that there was evidence before the trial court, consisting of the court’s private examination of the two oldest children,, which is not included in the record. A similar question was presented in Ruck v. Ruck, 265 Ala. 29,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruck v. RuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Calvert v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Fountain v. Vredenburgh Saw Mill CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- City of Boaz v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walker v. Southern Trucking CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Boise Cascade Corporation v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Hagler v. HaglerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Stuckey v. StuckeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Graves v. GravesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.