Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Daniel Paul Copple v. Vital Core, et al.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided May 21, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00069Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION DANIEL PAUL COPPLE PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:25-CV-69-DMB-RP VITAL CORE, et al. DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Daniel Paul Copple asserts

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claims alleging inadequate medical treatment during his confinement. Because Copple fails to state an Eighth Amendment claim against the defendants for inadequate medical care, this case will be dismissed. I Procedural History On February 10, 2026, Daniel Paul Copple filed an amended pro se prisoner complaint in the United States District Court for the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API