FRIE BOULEVARD TRIANGLE CORP. v. City of Schenectady
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs commenced the instant action against the defendant City of Schenectady, New York (“City” or “Schenectady”) contending that Schenectady’s zoning ordinance regulating adult entertainment businesses violates their constitutional rights. A second cause of action alleges that amendments to the ordinance were not properly enacted. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 seeking a declaration that the City’s Adult Entertainment Ordinance (hereinafter “Adult Entertainment Ordinance” or “Ordinance”) as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diners Club International Limited v. privatedinersclubportal.co.ukDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025