Legal Opinion

Royal Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1972No. 5-5953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellee filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits alleging that she was totally and permanently disabled because of residuals suffered from a cut on one of her fingers. The Commission found that appellee had suffered a 25% functional disabilty to the body as a whole and further determined that, based upon appellee’s age, education and type of work history, she was entitled to a 50% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. From an affirmance of this award by the Circuit Court, appellant brings this appeal asserting for reversal that the award is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson & Co. v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Quality Excelsior Coal Company v. MaestriSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Dacus Casket Co. v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Plants v. Townsend Curtner Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corbitt v. Mohawk Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Burks, Inc. v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Motor Queen Motel v. SandlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API