Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1947No. 5255PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The appellant, Smith, filed his application in the United States Patent Office and claimed invention in the construction of a heat ex*1008changer such as a radiator used for water cooling purposes in an automobile or the like.

The Primary Examiner rejected claims 10 to 14, inclusive,, which rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. No claims were allowed. The rejection was based upon the ground that the claims were unpatentable over a number of references cited by the examiner. Erom the board’s decision, appellant has here appealed.

Appellant in this court conceded that all the elements of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BuserCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. In Re KaufmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. Application of Alexander C. McCabeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Application of Alfred R. Conti and Daniel J. MenterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API