Legal Opinion

Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided November 1, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 5532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, District Judge.

Statement of the Case

The Bishop and Babcock Manufacturing Company brought this action against Fedders-Quigan Corporation for alleged infringement of the Getz patent No. 2,594,008, which issued to plaintiff as assignee on April 22, 1952, for improvements in “Cellular Core for Heat Exchange Units”. The identity of the parties, plaintiff’s ownership of the patent, the acts of the defendant in making and selling heat exchange cores, including accused and non-accused models, jurisdiction of the Court, and like formal matters, were admitted and stipulated.

By Answer and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greening Nursery Co. v. J & R Tool & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966
  2. Schaefer, Inc. v. Mohawk Cabinet Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API