Legal Opinion

(PS) Crago v. Sacramento County Towing Enforcement Supervisor

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00086Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY CRAGO, No. 2:25-cv-00086-DC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY TOWING 15 ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR, et. al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Mary Crago proceeds without counsel in this action.1 On March 28, 2025, the 19 Court issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend and granting plaintiff 20 thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff filed a first amended 21 complaint (“FAC”) on May 29, 2025, which is now…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API