Legal Opinion

People v. Peabody

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1971No. Docket 10390PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of sodomy. MOLA 750.158; MSA 28.355.

The defendant took the stand and denied that he had committed the offense. At the conclusion of his testimony, his lawyer brought out that he had previously been convicted of drinking and fighting offenses and had pled guilty to “indecent liberties.”

The entire cross-examination of the defendant consisted of the following:

By Mr. Stephan[assistcmt prosecuting attorney]:

“Q. Mr. Peabody, you pled guilty to indecent liberties in Chicago ?
“A. That is right.
“Q. What was the original charge?
“Mr. MilanowsTti…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BrocatoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. JelksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Cachola v. the Kroger CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. KillebrewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. HolcombMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. Paul MathisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. William JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API