Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Azizian v. Curran

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 21, 1926No. 343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

If there were evidence from which a reasonable Board of Inquiry could have found the elder alien illiterate, we would be bound by the finding; and not only does this record show such evidence, but it demonstrates complete ignorance of the art of reading.

She was tried twice, first with a card of printed Armenian, as required by section 3 of Act Feb. 5, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 42891/4b), and second with a primer produced by herself; and admitted herself a failure. There was no obligation on the department to give relator more than…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Engel v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. United States ex rel. Ghersin v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. United States ex rel. Friedman v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Ming Wang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States ex rel. De Sousa v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Navigazione Generale Italiana v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Illiterate Aliens Seeking Admission as Immigrants, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API