United States ex rel. Azizian v. Curran
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
If there were evidence from which a reasonable Board of Inquiry could have found the elder alien illiterate, we would be bound by the finding; and not only does this record show such evidence, but it demonstrates complete ignorance of the art of reading.
She was tried twice, first with a card of printed Armenian, as required by section 3 of Act Feb. 5, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 42891/4b), and second with a primer produced by herself; and admitted herself a failure. There was no obligation on the department to give relator more than…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Engel v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- United States ex rel. Ghersin v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- United States ex rel. Friedman v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Smith v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Ming Wang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States ex rel. De Sousa v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Navigazione Generale Italiana v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Illiterate Aliens Seeking Admission as Immigrants, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.