Legal Opinion
Wunder v. Macomber
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chablbs Lambíase, J.
On November 2,1961, following a public hearing had on July 11, 1961, respondent Board of Appeals denied petitioners’ application of July 7, 1961 for a variance of the provisions of article Y of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Brighton, New York, entitled “ Provisions Applicable to Residential Districts ”, and particularly sections 19 and 20, in effect on said dates as it applies to the premises of the petitioners located at 2171 West Henrietta Road, in the Town of Brighton, Monroe County, New York. Specifically, petitioners requested that a variance be granted so as to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Young Women's Hebrew Ass'n v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Parish of St. Andrew's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Holt-Lock, Inc. v. Zoning & Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Norooz v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Wasicki v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.