Legal Opinion

Davis v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 2002No. A02A1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

Wanda Davis appeals the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Blockbuster, Inc. in her tort action, arguing that the trial court erred in finding as a matter of law that (1) Blockbuster owed no duty to Davis to screen each and every video in its entirety each and every time that video is returned to it, and (2) her claims were barred by application of the “impact rule.” After discovering that a videotape which she had purchased from Blockbuster, Inc. (“Blockbuster”) for her four-year-old daughter contained explicit pornographic material, Davis filed suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Wright v. AsheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Boggs v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Amos v. City of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Simmons v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. All-Tech Inv. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Collins v. Navistar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Hodges v. Putzel Electric Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Reid v. Midwest TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Reid v. Waste Indus. USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API