Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1987No. CR 87-103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

A single information alleged that the appellant, Charles James Robinson, raped and robbed three different women on three different dates. The cases were severed and appellant was tried before a jury and received two ninety-nine year sentences as a habitual offender for the rape and aggravated robbery of the victim in the present case. On appeal appellant argues that the in-court identification should have been suppressed and that the evidence does not support the conviction for aggravated robbery. We find neither argument persuasive and therefore affirm the action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Westbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Frensley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tarentino v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Kendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Parkman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API