Legal Opinion
In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Crim. Proc.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 21, 2002No. SC906 35PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
820 So.2d 185 (2002)
IN RE AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURERULE 3.112 MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEYS IN CAPITAL CASES.
No. SC906 35.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 21, 2002.
Rehearing Denied June 18, 2002.
Philip J. Padovano, Judge, First District Court of Appeal, Tallahassee, FL, Chair, Committee on Minimum Standards for Attorneys in Capital Cases; Oscar H. Eaton, Jr., Chair, The Florida Bar Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Sanford, FL, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL; Robert Trammell, General Counsel, Florida Public Defender…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Ferrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURESupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Olive v. MaasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Curtis Windom v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2025
- In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence CodeSupreme Court of Florida · 2019