Legal Opinion
Oak Downs, Inc. v. Schmid
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 13, 1936No. 12094PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of a district court of Dallas county, on a suit by appellee, R. A. (Smoot) Schmid, as a citizen of Dallas county, to enjoin appellants Oak Downs, Inc., Winfield Morten, Jackson Thurman, F. G. Cameron, and E. W. Morten Realty Company, a corporation, from operating the pari-mutuel or-certificate system of betting on dog races at their dog-racing plant in Dallas county.
The petition of appellee was filed in a district court of Dallas- county, June 21, 1935, and prayed for a temporary writ of injunction. All parties made appearance, either in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Ex Parte AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Benson v. FulmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Hurt v. Oak Downs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- All Texas Racing Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Adi Weinberg v. Dovev Baharav and Dvir Birgir, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Oak Downs, Inc. v. SchmidTexas Supreme Court · 1936