Legal Opinion
City of Aberdeen v. Regan
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 18, 2008No. 36715-7-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
195 P.3d 1015 (2008)
CITY OF ABERDEEN, Petitioner,
v.
Francis James REGAN, Respondent.
No. 36715-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 18, 2008.
Eric S. Nelson, Attorney at Law, Aberdeen, WA, for Petitioner.
Eric J. Nielsen, David Bruce Koch, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
HOUGHTON, P.J.
¶ 1 The superior court reversed and remanded a municipal court finding that Francis Regan violated a condition of his probation. The City of Aberdeen appeals, arguing that the superior court erred because it applied the wrong burden of proof. The City contends that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Standlee v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Daryl Standlee v. B. J. RhayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010