Legal Opinion

In Re Violation of Rule 38

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 7, 2011No. 2011-M981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Underwood Livestock, Inc. (“Underwood”) appealed from a decision of the Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) granting the government’s motion for summary judgment that Underwood cannot establish a property interest in a destroyed tire dam structure because of issue preclusion. The relevant facts of this case and the court’s decision on the merits are detailed in this court’s opinion affirming the decision of the Claims Court. Underwood Livestock, Inc. v. United States, 417 Fed.Appx. 934 (Fed.Cir.2011). This court previously found Underwood’s appeal to be both frivolous as filed and…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James Constant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Herbert J. Abbs and Peter J. Wisner, Claimants-Appellants v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Sophie A. Szopa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Kyler v. EversonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Wheeler v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pirri v. CheekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API