Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Anthony

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1998No. 014 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1997PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question presented for review is whether the present prosecution of appellant is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, principles of collateral estoppel, or the compulsory joinder provision of 18 Pa.C.S. § 110. (hereinafter § 110). As we find the present prosecution barred by the compulsory joinder provision of § 110 we do not reach the equitable or constitutional claims presented. For the reasons that follow, the decision of the Superior Court is reversed.

The nature of the claims presented for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. McPhailSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API