Legal Opinion
Richards v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1991No. 1:90-cr-00057PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is a diversity personal injury case which was removed by the defendant, The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (“defendant” or “P & G”), from the New York State court before the plaintiff (“plaintiff” or "Richards”) had filed a demand for a jury trial in the New York court. Additionally, subsequent to the case being removed, Richards failed to file a timely demand for a jury trial pursuant to either Rule 38(b) or 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a situation which occurs not infrequently. He now demands a jury trial in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Lisette Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Catapano v. Western Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corinthian Media, Inc. v. PutnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- National Union Fire Insurance v. L.E. Myers Co. GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Credit Bureau of Council Bluffs, Inc. v. Credit Bureau Data Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
- Lechuga v. Stop & ShopDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026