Legal Opinion

Lechuga v. Stop & Shop

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 18, 2026No. 7:25-cv-07327Unknown

1Opinion

DESIMONE & □□ {Application granted. As an initial matter, the Court, in its 745 Fifth Avenuldiscretion, construes the parties’ letters (Docs. 17 and 18) New York. New2S the motion itself. See Jn re Best Payphones, Inc., 450 ° JF. App’x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011)). Having considered the Tercpnone co parties’ respective letters (Docs. 17 and 18), and caselaw elecopier ( cited therein, the Court in its discretion overrules defendant's objections and grants plaintiff's motion for leave to file a jury demand in this case on all issues so triable. See Thompson v. Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 1998 WL 689937, at *2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Lisette Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Rupolo v. Oshkosh Truck Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. Reliance Electric Co. v. Exxon Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API