Legal Opinion

Wastewater Specialties LLC v. Clayton

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 31, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00516Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION WASTEWATER SPECIALTIES, LLC PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:20-CV-00516-BSM CHARLES P. CLAYTON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Wastewater’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint [Doc. No. 30] is granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Wastewater’s motion for leave to file a reply [Doc. No. 35] is granted. Wastewater’s motion to compel arbitration [Doc. No. 12] is granted. Wastewater’s motion for leave to file a reply [Doc. No. 20] is granted. The joint motion for a scheduling order extension [Doc. No 36] is denied as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Steve R. Faber v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. BurbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hot Spring County Medical Center v. Arkansas Radiology Affiliates, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Graybar Elec. Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API