Cade v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of World
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
The complaint states in substance that Walter Cade and Lydia L. Cade, the appellant, were married on the 11th day of August, 1896; that in 1898, during said coverture, said Walter Cade became a member of what is known as “Home Camp,” which is a lodge or camp subordinate to the respondent association, and thereupon took out a benefit certificate, Ho. 52,597, in the said Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the World, in the sum of $2,000, payable to his wife; that the certificate was delivered by him to his wife and left in her…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Martin v. StubbingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Splawn v. ChewTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Masonic Benevolent Ass'n v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Society v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Slaughter v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Francis v. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Holden v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.