Cook v. United States National Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoBEIDE, J.
1. In order to recover in this proceeding claimant must show by satisfactory and convincing evidence, first, that at the time of the death of Dr. Fisher, claimant had a complete subsisting contract with deceased; second, that he and his cobeneficiary had complied with all the stipulations therein prescribed by the contract to be performed by them; third, that deceased breached the contract; and fourth, that damage resulted from such breach. All these facts must be evidenced by some corroborating evidence other than that of the claimant.
Outside of the fact that there was an exchange of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Slooten v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Franklin v. NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Slaughter v. DavenportSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Scott v. Merrill's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Carpenter v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Parker v. HilliardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Jensen v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.