Legal Opinion

Lormic Development Corp. v. North American Roofing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1989No. 8926SC23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs assert that the trial court erred in granting defendant Diversitech’s motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ claims. Summary judgment is a drastic measure which should be used with caution since no person should be deprived of a trial on a genuine issue of material fact. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 296 N.C. 400, 402, 250 S.E.2d 255, 257 (1979), see also Sauls v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 62 N.C. App. 533, 303 S.E.2d 358 (1983). In considering a motion for summary judgment a trial court is bound to view all the evidence and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
  2. Adventure Travel World, Ltd. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API