Lormic Development Corp. v. North American Roofing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs assert that the trial court erred in granting defendant Diversitech’s motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ claims. Summary judgment is a drastic measure which should be used with caution since no person should be deprived of a trial on a genuine issue of material fact. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 296 N.C. 400, 402, 250 S.E.2d 255, 257 (1979), see also Sauls v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 62 N.C. App. 533, 303 S.E.2d 358 (1983). In considering a motion for summary judgment a trial court is bound to view all the evidence and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Adventure Travel World, Ltd. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992