United States v. Philip J. Goldberg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Goldberg appeals from the district court’s determination on remand from the United States Supreme Court that certain writings were not producible in his criminal trial under either the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, or the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
■ I. Facts and Prior Proceedings
Appellant was convicted on fourteen counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1341, each charging him with a separate transactional instance of use of the mail for the purpose of executing a fraudulent scheme of issuing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Harvey R. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.