W. K. Wetherill & Co. v. Scheffel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit on a written contract. The pleadings consisted of a statement of claim, an affidavit of defense and new matter, together with a rule for judgment. The rule for judgment was discharged. The case was tried before Jones, J., without a jury. The court found for the defendant. A motion for new trial was filed by plaintiff and dismissed. Judgment for the defendant was entered on the finding. Plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff’s statement of claim set forth an agreement in writing between the parties. The agreement on its face and by its terms was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rome Sales & Service Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Stern Company v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Drummond v. WalkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986