Legal Opinion

Schuh v. Druckman & Sinel, L.L.P.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 2010No. 07 Civ. 366 (LAK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, dated June 29, 2010, are entirely without merit. The motion of defendant Druekman & Sinel, LLP, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint [DI115] is granted.

SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Christopher and Diane Schuh brought this suit raising a number of claims relating to the efforts by various banks to foreclose on the Schuhs’ property following the Schuhs’ failure to pay their mortgage. A prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Carwile, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Bodur v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Zirogiannis v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  5. Plummer v. Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API