Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Washington Glass Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1895No. 1,462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Gavin, J. —

The appellee sought to recover the purchase-price of real estate, which, it was alleged, appellant had agreed to buy, and for which appellee had tendered a deed in performance of the contract.

It is not controverted by appellee that the contract was by parol and within the statute of frauds (R. S. 1894, section 6629, subd. 4; R. S. 1881, section 4904), unless taken out of its operation by part performance. Possession taken is relied upon to make the contract valid.

Passing by all technical questions of parties and want of averment of transfer of contract, we take up the main…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rucker v. SteelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Judy v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McHenryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Johnson v. PontiousIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Swales v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mowrey v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API