Legal Opinion

Gammon v. Huse

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 4, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, P. J.

The position of appellant’s counsel, that a promissory note made by a partnership firm, payable to one of its co-partners, is without validity, and creates no right or lia bility while in the hands of the payee, is unsound. Such a note, if founded on a sufficient consideration, creates a valid obligation, not less than if it were payable to a third person, the only difference being in the nature of the remedy, in default of payment. The payee cannot sue upon such a note in an action at law, as to do so he would have to sue himself, but he has a complete remedy in a court of chancery. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maitland v. Citizens' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  2. Fisher v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Manning v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Smith v. LusherCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  5. Worcester National Bank v. CheeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Burns v. LandrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Barber v. General Automotive Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Ehrler v. WorthenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API