Hylton v. Town of Mount Airy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The only exception presented in the assignment of error in the record on this appeal is to the signing, of the judgment from which appeal is taken. Such an exception challenges only the conclusions of law upon the facts found by the court or upon which the parties agree, — as in this case, the facts set out in the agreed statement and those admitted in the pleadings in accordance with the stipulations of the parties. Vestal v. Machine Co., 219 N. C., 468, 14 S. E. (2d), 427; Manning v. Ins. Co., ante, 251. If the judgment be supported by the facts it will be affirmed. Rader v. Coach Co., 225…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Roberts v. . GroganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Ingram v. Yadkin River Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Smith v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Roach v. . PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.