Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Sarafan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*857OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s horse, “Blazin’ C”, was disqualified as the winner of the fifth race at Aqueduct Racetrack on January 18, 1980 for carrying an incorrect weight. Based on its recent racing history, “Blazin’ C” was not entitled to the five-pound weight allowance with which it ran in the subject race. Since the ultimate responsibility for insuring that a horse carries the correct weight has been placed upon the owner (9 NYCRR 4033.7), petitioner cannot be heard to blame the racing secretary for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. New York State Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Cruz v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Cramer v. New York State Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. American National Fire Insurance v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API