Legal Opinion

Shiebler v. Griffing

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Taxpayers’ action to compel restitution of a sum of money paid pursuant to a resolution of the- board of supervisors of Suffolk county.

1Opinion of the CourtVast Siclen, J.

Plaintiffs have brought a taxpayers’ action under section 51 of the General Municipal Law against the above named defendants to compel restitution of the sum of $2,500 paid pursuant to a certain resolution of the board of supervisors of Suffolk county, December 30, 1907, said resolution being as follows:

“Resolved, That the County Judge of Suffolk County be allowed five hundred dollars per annum as salary for a Clerk from the first day of January, 1908, the same to be paid by the County Treasurer out of any money he may have on hand not otherwise appropriated.”

There seems to be no doubt that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Queens County Water Co. v. MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Wakefield v. BrophyNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sheldon v. MacArthurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. McNeil v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paliotto v. Town of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Eagle Nest Corp. v. CarrollNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Meinhardt v. BrittingNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API