United States v. Reyes-Gomez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Francisco Reyes-Gomez claims on appeal that the sentence imposed by the district court was substantively unreasonable. Although the sentencing judge found that Reyes-Gomez qualified for the safety valve exception to the 120-month mandatory minimum sentence, he nonetheless imposed a 135-month term of imprisonment. We affirm.
I
Reyes-Gomez pled guilty to conspiracy to import a controlled substance (Count One), 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 (a), 960(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B), 963, and unlawful entry into the United States (Count Five), 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(1). He faced a 120-month…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ruiz-HuertasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Ortiz-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Vega-SalgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Marrero-PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Padilla-ColónCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. De La CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Méndez-BáezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- RICMIC LLC v. Salient Networks, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Teradata US, Inc. v. SAP SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- United States v. Santana-MelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021