Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Teradata US, Inc. v. SAP SE

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 1, 2021No. 3:20-cv-06127Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERADATA US, INC., Case No. 20-cv-06127-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 SAP SE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants. 11 12 Defendants SAP SE, SAP America, Inc., and SAP Labs, LLC (SAP) move to dismiss the 13 patent infringement claims brought by plaintiff Teradata US, Inc. (Teradata) under

U.S. Patent No. 14

ʼ7,185,000 (ʼ000 Patent) under Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Intern.,

573 U.S. 208

(2014) 15 (Alice), arguing that the ʼ000 Patent is directed to abstract mental processes or mathematics…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API