Legal Opinion

COFFIN v. AMETEK INC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 16, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00472Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE VICTOR COFFIN, an individual, and ) VICTOR COFFIN, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of ) LINDA COFFIN, deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:18-cv-472-NT ) AMETEK, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE Plaintiff Victor Coffin alleges that he was exposed to asbestos and that as a result he developed malignant mesothelioma. Both Defendant Maine Central Railroad (“MCRR”) and Defendant Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) have moved to exclude the expert testimony of Jerrold L. Abraham, M.D.,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API