United States v. Tarcuanu
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order vacating service of the summons in a civil action on the ground that the defendant is a duly accredited vice consul, and in charge of the Royal Consulate General of the kingdom o£ Roumania, in the city of New York. As the summons was served without a complaint, the nature of the action does not appear.
“Consuls, as such, and unless expressly invested with a diplomatic character in addition to their ordinary powers, are not considered as intrusted with authority to represent their sovereign in his intercourse with foreign states, or to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Froment v. DuclosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
- Herman v. ApetzNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Moracchini v. MoracchiniNew York Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- Auer v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938