Southern Railway Co. v. Neeley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Presiding Judge.
1. It is elementary that medical services furnished to a minor child are classified as necessaries. McCarter v. McCarter, 10 Ga. App. 754 (74 S. E. 308), and Buhler v. Cohn, 31 Ga. App. 463 (120 S. E. 785). This court also recognizes -the fact that it is the duty of a father to provide for the maintenance, protection, and education of his child. See Code § 74-105. There are many citations to this effect. In Krasner v. O’Dell, 89 Ga. App. 718 (80 S. E. 2d 852), this court held that medical expenses incurred for treatment of a minor child’s injuries, as well as the loss…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Waldrup v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Krasner v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Coleman v. Dublin Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Isom v. SchettinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Cohen v. SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Saunds v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965