Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Miller
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 26, 2014No. Civil No. 2:13-CV-00132-NTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jonathan E. Mitchell alleges that his rights under the Fourth Amendment and the common law of Maine were violated when he was shot and wounded by Defendant Robert Miller, a Portland, Maine police officer, after a high speed car chase. Before the Court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Defendant’s motion.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND1
The Plaintiff, Jonathan Mitchell, is a 32-year-old resident of Alton, Maine. Def.’s Statement of Material…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David J. Widi v. United States et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- MARCH v. FREYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Widi, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020