Legal Opinion
MARCH v. FREY
District Court, D. Maine
Decided April 28, 2020No. 2:15-cv-00515Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ANDREW MARCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:15-cv-515-NT ) AARON M. FREY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Andrew March is a protester who opposes abortion. He alleges that a provision of the Maine Civil Rights Act has been applied unconstitutionally against him, in violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Before me are motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 from Defendant Aaron Frey (the “Attorney General”) (ECF No. 162) and Defendant City…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.