Legal Opinion

United States v. Bergrin

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 21, 2010No. Criminal 09-369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge.

On November 10, 2009, a federal grand jury in Newark returned a thirty-nine count Superseding Indictment (hereinafter “Indictment” or “S.I.”) against Defendants Paul Bergrin, Yolanda Jauregui, Thomas Moran, Alejandro Barraza-Castro (“Alejandro”), Vicente Esteves, Alonso Barraza-Castro (“Alonso”), Jose Jimenez, and Sundiata Koontz. This Indictment charges an array of criminal activity, ranging from conspiracy to murder a government witness and witness bribery to mortgage fraud and drug conspiracy, with a prostitution charge in between. These varied…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul BergrinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Paul BergrinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API