Legal Opinion
Manders v. Brown
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 5, 1994No. 1893, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether the appellees were properly afforded the shield of legislative immunity when they modified the Urban Renewal Plan without first holding a public meeting, allegedly in violation of the Crisfield City Code, Article XIII, § C13-5(B). Appellant asks us to decide that municipal officials who function in a legislative or administrative capacity or whose conduct involves enforcement designed to further allegedly corrupt or fraudulent motives do not have the broad immunity available for legislative acts. Because the record below…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Baltimore Police Department v. CherkesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Green v. BrooksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Rich v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Penhollow v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS CECIL COUNTYCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Curtis v. PrachtDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.