Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mulhens & Kropff, Inc. v. Ferd. Muelhens, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 5, 1930No. 342Published

1DissentL. Hand, Circuit Judge

The transfer of a trade-mark along with a business is lawful, though it is somewhat doubtful whether customers who have come to rely upon the mark as the warrant for a certain standard of excellence, or commercial integrity, or the like, are in such cases really getting what they suppose. Under modem conditions, however, where the personnel of a business is so shifting, this consideration has not been controlling; it is assumed that the successor will maintain those qualities which the mark has come to identify. At any rate the practice has been long recognized and the public probably reckons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vick Medicine Co. v. Vick Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  2. Maas v. LonstorfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. W. A. Gaines & Co. v. Turner-Looker Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Orenstein & Koppel AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Modox Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API