Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Donovan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1922No. 1 Div. 254PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

Appellees sued the appellants to recover damages claimed to be demandable under an injunction (preliminary) bond; the injunction being dissolved in consequence of demurrer taking the ultimately sustained objection that the bill was without equity.

The former appeal in this action is reported in 17 Ala. App. 190, 84 South. 412.

There is motion to dismiss the appeal. In view of the conclusion prevailing on the merits, there is no necessity to pass upon the motion to dismiss.

The only damages actually claimed are predicated of plaintiff’s liability for attorney’s fees incurred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hood v. LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Doe ex dem Chamberlain, Miller & Co. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Tyson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Napier v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Kemp v. DonovanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Singleton v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORP. v. FieldingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API