Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwartz v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 6, 1984Published

1Dissent

Lazer, J. P.,

dissents and votes to affirm the order appealed from, with the following memorandum: I cannot agree that Special Term abused its discretion when it ordered this case removed to the Supreme Court and permitted plaintiffs to amend the ad damnum clause of their complaint. In affidavits supporting the motion for that relief, plaintiff Leanne Schwartz and her physician asserted that it is now known that her injuries were more serious than they were believed to be when the action was commenced in 1978 and that the delay in moving for proper relief stemmed from an erroneous diagnosis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Huston v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Fahy v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Robbins v. SperlazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API