Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.M.L.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 21, 1995No. 73,049PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, C.J.:

The natural father of M.M.L., a minor, appeals in a child in need of care case from an order of the district court placing M.M.L. in long-term foster care. He argues the best interests of the child standard in K.S.A. 38-1563(d) violates his constitutional right to custody of his child absent a finding of unfitness. The case was transferred to the Supreme Court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3017.

In compliance with the intent of Supreme Court Rule 7.043 (1994 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 42), the natural father will be referred to as appellant or Michael and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. City of Baxter Springs v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Sheppard v. SheppardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. Ruddick v. Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. In re T.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API