Avista Corp. v. Sanders County
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge.
At issue in this litigation is ownership of a former railroad right of way established under the Northern Pacific Land Grant Act of 1864. . The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which are fully briefed. Following a hearing, and the Court’s review of the briefs and other materials of record,
IT IS ORDERED that the individual Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
RATIONALE
I. Background
The parties do not dispute the following material facts. In 1864, Congress…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Glowdena B. Finnigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019