Paluszewski v. Tomczak

By this appeal the defendants seek to reverse an order entered by the municipal court of Chicago, denying their motion to vacate a judgment entered by confession.

Counsel for both parties have violated Rule 19 of this court by referring to the parties as “plaintiff in error” and “defendant in error,” which only tends to confuse. Rule 19'.provides that “the parties shall be designated plaintiff . . . and defendant as in the trial court.” This should be done without any explanation or apology.

February 21,1933, plaintiff caused judgment by confession to be entered against the defendants on a…